|
Pharmaceutical Products
Frequently,
drugs and medicines are at the center of toxic tort suits. The manufacturer
of a drug may be liable to a plaintiff if the drug proves to be
defective.
Also, Robbins Associates, P.C., Atlanta Georgia
personal injury attorneys, represents individuals who have
been harmed as a result of taking the drug Rezulin for the treatment
of type 2 diabetes. On March 22, 2000, the manufacturer voluntarily
removed this drug from the market after the Federal Drug Administration
determined that it was too dangerous for use.
Diet Products
Cold or Diet Pills That Contain Phenylpropanolamine
(PPA)
Baycol
Vioxx
Rezulin
FEN-PHEN
Thimerosol
Diet Products
Drug stores move to remove cold, diet drugs after
FDA warning. November 7, 2000
Web posted at: 5:00 AM EST (1000 GMT)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A number of major drug store chains are pulling
dozens of over-the-counter cold remedies and diet pills from their
shelves after the government warned that an ingredient could cause
hemorrhagic strokes, especially in young women. Rite Aid, with 3,800
drug stores in 30 states and the District of Columbia, soon will
begin posting warning signs and removing products with PPA, spokeswoman
Jody Cook said.
"We would advise our customers to check with
the pharmacist about the alternatives," she said.
CVS Pharmacy, which has 4,100 stores, and Walgreen Co., with 3,200
stores, made similar announcements.
The Food and Drug Administration issued an unusually strong warning
Monday, telling Americans to immediately quit using drugs containing
phenylpropanolamine, or PPA, which is found Dexatrim, Tavist-D and
dozens of other over-the-counter medicines. The agency, which intends
to ban the ingredient, asked manufacturers voluntarily to stop selling
PPA-containing drugs immediately and to replace the ingredient with
a safer alternative.
Dieters will need to consult doctors
Dr. Charles Ganley, the FDA's nonprescription drugs chief, said
buyers should be alert for PPA in the ingredient list of nonprescription
cold relievers -- both brand names and generic or store brands --
and instead choose decongestant pills with the safe alternative
pseudoephedrine or use nasal sprays.
Over-the-counter alternatives do not exist for diet
pills, however, so dieters will have to consult doctors about prescription-only
alternatives, Ganley said.
Whitehall-Robins Healthcare quit shipping PPA-containing
Dimetapp on Monday. New liquid Dimetapp formulas lacking PPA will
head for store shelves next week, with pill versions to follow.
Also, some stores are selling PPA-containing versions of its Robitussin-CF
product, and some are selling a new non-PPA formula, in boxes flagged
with a yellow band.
SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare said people
should not use its PPA-containing Contac 12-hour Cold Capsules,
but five other Contac versions contain the safe pseudoephedrine.
Risk is small, effects can be deadly
Even though manufacturers learned three weeks ago that the FDA was
preparing to act, when the agency's scientific advisers declared
PPA unsafe, many scrambled Monday to decide what to do.
Top-selling manufacturers that refused to reveal their
plans include Novartis Corp., maker of PPA-containing Triaminic
and Tavist-D; Bayer Corp., maker of Alka-Seltzer Plus cold medicines;
and Chattem Inc., maker of Dexatrim diet pills.
About 6 billion doses of PPA are sold in this country
each year, mostly without prescriptions. There are a few PPA-containing
prescription decongestants, and the FDA asked their makers also
to stop selling them while it moves to ban prescription use as well.
While the risk of a hemorrhagic stroke, or bleeding
in the brain, is very small to an individual user, these are often
deadly strokes, and survivors can be left disabled.
With millions of Americans swallowing PPA daily, the FDA estimated
it could be to blame for 200 to 500 strokes yearly just in people
under age 50.
Hemorrhagic strokes typically occur in the elderly,
and are extremely rare under age 50. In the 1980s, however, medical
journals cited several dozen young women who suddenly had strokes
days after taking their first PPA-containing diet pill.
A five-year Yale University study comparing PPA use
among stroke survivors with healthy people concluded that PPA increases
stroke risk for young women within three days of taking PPA-containing
appetite suppressants, or within three days of taking their first-ever
PPA dose for any reason. In some cases, using PPA increased stroke
risk 12- to 15-fold.
Nobody knows why, although first-time PPA use sometimes
temporarily raises blood pressure, an effect that wanes as the body
gets used to the drug. Risk was highest with the higher doses --
more than 75 milligrams daily -- that dieters typically used.
The study didn't find men at risk, but the FDA cautioned
that enough men weren't studied to be sure they're OK.
FDA Issues Warning
back to top
Cold or Diet Pills That
Contain Phenylpropanolamine (PPA)
The FDA has warned all Americans that they should
not take cold or diet pills that contain phenylpropanolamine
(PPA). PPA has been linked to a higher risk of hemorrhagic
stroke among young women. The FDA also asked manufacturers to stop
selling drugs that contain PPA and to replace it with a safer ingredient.
Many drug stores began pulling products containing PPA from the
shelves and have posted warnings about the potential dangers.
The FDA is considering adding warning labels to Celebrex
indicating that it may be linked to an increased risk for heart
attacks. This news comes after a study showed that patients taking
a similar drug called Vioxx ran four times the risk for heart attack
as those taking regular pain relievers such as ibuprofen. Because
both drugs are COX-2 inhibitors, the FDA would apply labels to both
medications.
May 25 — Ever since Celebrex and Vioxx hit the
market in 1999, consumers have been bombarded with television ads
depicting the benefits of the new arthritis drugs. Celebrex commercials
showed joyful arthritis sufferers practicing tai chi, strolling
the beach and zipping along scenic roads on tandem bicycles to the
tune of “Celebrate.” Vioxx ads had similar themes, featuring
arthritis patients pushing wheelbarrows, hammering nails and generally
living it up.
At this point we don’t know the exact answer to that question.
What this comes down to is a question of whether the increased heart
risk is caused by a property that’s associated with this entire
class of drugs [Cox-2 inhibitors, which includes both Vioxx and
Celebrex] or we’re talking about a property that is unique
to Vioxx. We don’t know the answer to that with certainty
yet.
What is it about Vioxx that’s causing the heart problems.
How does the drug work?
This study does not address the explanation for the increased rate
of heart disease. One suggested explanation is that a drug like
naproxen, like aspirin, actually protects people from heart disease,
and that same level of protection is not afforded by a drug like
Vioxx. It may be that a drug like Vioxx is different from naproxen
or aspirin in terms of how it affects platelets. Whereas aspirin
or naproxen protects from heart attacks because of their effect
on platelets, a drug like Vioxx does not have those properties.
It has also been suggested that Cox-2 inhibitors themselves might
damage coronary vessels and that it is the drug itself that is leading
to either increased clotting or damage to the vessel wall, but I
think that’s quite controversial, and we lack sufficient evidence
at this point to know exactly what the explanation is.
Merck is now recommending that patients on Vioxx take a low dose
of aspirin along with the Vioxx. Will that offset the risk?
Certainly from a public-health standpoint, using low-dose aspirin
is something that is recommended as a way to reduce the risk of
heart disease. While I don’t think that it’s been proven,
combining low-dose aspirin with treatment makes practical sense.
Are there differences in the pain relief offered by Vioxx and Celebrex
versus other arthritis medications?
I don’t think that either Celebrex or Vioxx is more effective
for pain relief than traditional nonsteroidal drugs. On the other
hand, I think there’s rather substantial evidence that both
drugs are much safer in terms of reducing the risk of side effects,
particularly gastrointestinal side effects, like ulcer, gastrointestinal
bleeding or obstructions.
If patients are now supposed to take aspirin, which has a higher
risk of those gastrointestinal side effects like ulcers, will that
offset the benefit of Celebrex and Vioxx?
We’re talking about a very low recommended dose. We’re
talking a baby aspirin a day. There might be a very, very small
increase in GI side effects, but the protective effects on the heart
might outweigh that increase.
No studies have been released on the heart risks
associated specifically with Celebrex. Is it safe to assume that
the risks posed by Vioxx are similar to those posed by Celebrex,
since they’re both in the same drug category?
back to top
Baycol
German drug manufacturer Bayer AG pulled their popular
cholesterol lowering drug, Baycol from the market.
Baycol was withdrawn from the market because it has been linked
to 31 US deaths from a muscle-related side effect, according to
the US Food and Drug Administration. Baycol is one of an extraordinarily
popular family of cholesterol-lowering drugs called "statins."
Baycol was approved in the United States by the FDA in 1997.
The FDA had received reports of Baycol
patients experiencing severe rhabdomyolysis. Rhabdomyolysis is a
condition that causes muscle-cell breakdown (atrophy) and causes
muscle pain, weakness, tenderness, malaise, fever, dark urine, nausea
and vomiting.
In a Reuters article the FDA claimed that in some
cases, rhabdomyolysis is so severe that patients develop failure
of the kidney or other organs, which can be fatal.
In a written statement the said, "the FDA has received reports
of 31 US deaths due to severe rhabdomyolysis associated with use
of Baycol.'' Twelve of the 31 deaths involved patients taking another
drug, gemfibrozil, the FDA said.
"While all statins have been associated with
very rare reports of rhabdomyolysis, cases of fatal rhabdomyolysis
in association with the use of Baycol have been reported significantly
more frequently than for other approved statins,'' the FDA said.
Baycol patients who are experiencing
muscle pain or are also taking gemfibrozil should discontinue Baycol
immediately and consult their physician, the FDA said. Others taking
Baycol should talk to their doctors about switching
to alternative medications, the agency advised.
back to top
Vioxx
The popular and heavily advertised arthritis drugs
Vioxx and Celebrex have been linked
by researchers to an increase in the risk of blood, clots, heart
attacks and strokes. The study from the Cleveland Clinic appeared
in the Journal of the American Medical Association and was based
on an analysis of previous clinical trials. Celebrex
and Vioxx are projected to produce U.S. sales greater
than $6 billion this year.
In a study of more than 8,000 patients that compared
the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (Vioxx) with the
traditional NSAID naproxen, the risk of cardiovascular problems,
including heart attack, chest pain related to heart disease, stroke,
sudden death and blood clots, was more than two times higher in
the rofecoxib group than in the naproxen group.
Vioxx and Celebrex
are classified as and known as COX-2 inhibitors, or coxibs. COX-2
inhibitors, like older drugs such as ibuprofen and naproxen, are
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs. Older NSAIDs reduce
inflammation by blocking an enzyme called COX-2, but they also block
another enzyme called COX-1. This enzyme helps protect the lining
of the stomach, so blocking COX-1 can cause stomach irritation.
COX-2 inhibitors only block COX-2, leaving the stomach-protecting
COX-1 alone.
The annual rates of heart attack in both the Celebrex
(celecoxib) and Vioxx (rofecoxib) studies were
increased compared to a review of studies containing a total of
more than 48,000 patients. In those studies, 0.52% of patients taking
an inactive placebo pill had a heart attack each year. The annual
rate of heart attack was 0.74% for patients taking rofecoxib and
0.80% for those taking celecoxib.
The researches believe that until more research is
done, doctors should use caution in prescribing Vioxx
and Celebrex to patients with heart disease.
back to top
Rezulin
Rezulin Special Update
Recent Rezulin settlements have been reached between
victims of Rezulin side effects(plaintiffs) and
the manufacturer of Rezulin. If you or a loved
one has been injured by Rezulin it is important to contact an Atlanta,
Georgia personal injury and defective product attorney
experienced in Rezulin litigation quickly as these cases are subject
to statute of limitations. To have your case reviewed by an experienced
Georgia Rezulin attorney please
click the link above for a free case evaluation.
On March 21, 2000 head of the FDA's center for Drug
evaluation and Research stated that the "Continued use of Rezulin"
posed an "unacceptable risk " to diabetes patients. At
least 63 Rezulin users have died of liver failure.
The total number of Rezulin related deaths is estimated to be as
many as ten times higher than the reported 63 cases. For this reason,
Rezulin was removed from the United States market.
Doctors prescribed Rezulin to diabetics who took insulin
but whose blood sugar was not well controlled. Rezulin was designed
to help insulin (either your own or injected) work better, by drawing
the sugar from your blood into the cells to supply energy.
Rezulin was approved for diabetics
who:
- Used insulin
- Took certain types of oral antihyperglycemic medications
or fodiabetics
- Could no longer be controlled by diet and exercise
alone.
Rezulin was banned in England in
December 1997, following the death of an American who took the drug.
The drug manufacturer, Warner-Lambert successfully fought a ban
on Rezulin in the U.S. for 27 months before the
FDA decided to prohibit sales of Rezulin on March 21, 2000. Since
this date hundreds of Rezulin related lawsuits
have been filed.
Before the ban, sales of Rezulin
generated Warner-Lambert $1.8 billion in revenues. At its peak,
the drug was prescribed 488,000 times in January of 1999. 63 Rezulin
users have reportedly died from use of the drug. The deaths were
caused by liver failure. The total number of deaths associated with
Rezulin is likely to exceed 63 by many times according
to experts.
Recent Rezulin settlements have been reached between
victims (plaintiffs) and the manufacturer. If you or a loved one
has been injured by Rezulin it is important to
contact an Atlanta, Georgia Rezulin attorney quickly
as these cases are subject to statute of limitations. To have your
case reviewed by an experienced Georgia Rezulin attorney
please click the link below for a free case evaluation.
back to top
FEN-PHEN
In September 1997, the FDA requested the recall of
fenfluramine (Pondimin) and dexfenfluramine (Redux), two drugs taken
with phentermine to produce a weight loss “drug cocktail.”
Increasing evidence that fen-phen caused heart valve defects led
the FDA to order the recall. Read the FDA press release below.
back to top
(Mercury Poisoning from Vaccines)
Thimerosal is the most common preservative
that is used in vaccines and biologics that are marketed in the
United States. Thimerosal is used to help prevent
a vaccine from spoiling, for inactivating bacteria used to formulate
several vaccines, and in preventing bacterial contamination of the
final product. Several of the vaccines recommended routinely for
children in the United States contain thimerosal. However, reports
have surfaced linking thimerosal to mercury poisoning in infants
often causing autism.
On July 7, 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics
(AAP) issued with the US Public Health Service (USPHS) a joint statement
alerting clinicians and the public of concern about thimerosal,
a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines. The reason
for the warning is that thimerosal contains a related
mercury compound called ethyl mercury. Mercury is a toxic metal
that can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral
dysfunctions.
The Food and Drug Administration suggested that some
infants, depending on which vaccines they receive and the timing
of those vaccines, may be exposed to levels of ethyl mercury that
could build up to exceed one of the federal guidelines established
for the intake of methyl mercury. Symptoms of mercury toxicity in
young children are extremely similar to those of autism.
This can explain the recent increase in the numbers
of children diagnosed with autism since the early 1990's. The numerous
amount of children diagnosed with autism seems to directly correlate
with the recommendation of both the hepatitis B and HIB vaccine
to infants in the early 1990s. Autism is a neurological disorder
that is characterized by impairments in language, cognitive and
social development.
Autism symptoms are usually encountered in the first
two years of life. In the past autism was considered a rare disorder
with an incidence of occurrence of approximately 1-3 per 10,000
births. More recently however, Autism is being diagnosed much more
frequently with an incidence of occurrence of 20-40 per 10,000 births
and reports of 1 per 150 births have been reported in several states
including New Jersey and California.
SEE OUR FREE CASE EVALUATION
FORM
back to top
|