SEND THIS PAGE TO FRIEND NEED A LAWYER? CLICK HERE
Atlanta Georgia Personal Injury , Rezulin  Information  - Personal and Catastrophic Injuries, Product Liability, Defective Products, Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Attorneys in Atlanta Georgia Personal Injury Newsline Home PageFind a Personal Injury Lawyer in Atlanta GeorgiaGeorgia Medical Malpractice Law InformationAtlanta Georgia Legal MalpracticeGeorgia Nursing Home Negligence Georgia Workers' CompensationAtlanta Automobile AccidentsGeorgia Catastrophic Injury LawAtlanta Georgia Premises Liability and Inadequate Security LawGeorgia Product Liability Law InformationGeogia Class Action and Pharmaceutical LitigationAtlanta Georgia Personal Injury Legal Limitations  of ActionsHow Your Atlanta Georgia Personal Injury Case Should Be HandledGeorgia Personal Injury Financial Help ResourcesDo I Have A Case For My Personal Injury in Atlanta GeorgiaDisclaimer
   
Gerogia Personal Injury News and Information About  Baycol, Vioxx, Rezulin, FEN-PHEN, Thimerosol and Phenylpropanolamine (PPA).

Pharmaceutical Products

Atlanta, Gerogia Personal Injury News and Information About  Baycol, Vioxx, Rezulin, FEN-PHEN, Thimerosol and Phenylpropanolamine (PPA).Frequently, drugs and medicines are at the center of toxic tort suits. The manufacturer of a drug may be liable to a plaintiff if the drug proves to be defective.

Also, Robbins Associates, P.C., Atlanta Georgia personal injury attorneys, represents individuals who have been harmed as a result of taking the drug Rezulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. On March 22, 2000, the manufacturer voluntarily removed this drug from the market after the Federal Drug Administration determined that it was too dangerous for use.

Diet Products
Cold or Diet Pills That Contain Phenylpropanolamine (PPA)
Baycol
Vioxx
Rezulin
FEN-PHEN
Thimerosol

Diet Products

Drug stores move to remove cold, diet drugs after FDA warning. November 7, 2000

Web posted at: 5:00 AM EST (1000 GMT)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A number of major drug store chains are pulling dozens of over-the-counter cold remedies and diet pills from their shelves after the government warned that an ingredient could cause hemorrhagic strokes, especially in young women. Rite Aid, with 3,800 drug stores in 30 states and the District of Columbia, soon will begin posting warning signs and removing products with PPA, spokeswoman Jody Cook said.

"We would advise our customers to check with the pharmacist about the alternatives," she said.
CVS Pharmacy, which has 4,100 stores, and Walgreen Co., with 3,200 stores, made similar announcements.
The Food and Drug Administration issued an unusually strong warning Monday, telling Americans to immediately quit using drugs containing phenylpropanolamine, or PPA, which is found Dexatrim, Tavist-D and dozens of other over-the-counter medicines. The agency, which intends to ban the ingredient, asked manufacturers voluntarily to stop selling PPA-containing drugs immediately and to replace the ingredient with a safer alternative.

Dieters will need to consult doctors
Dr. Charles Ganley, the FDA's nonprescription drugs chief, said buyers should be alert for PPA in the ingredient list of nonprescription cold relievers -- both brand names and generic or store brands -- and instead choose decongestant pills with the safe alternative pseudoephedrine or use nasal sprays.

Over-the-counter alternatives do not exist for diet pills, however, so dieters will have to consult doctors about prescription-only alternatives, Ganley said.

Whitehall-Robins Healthcare quit shipping PPA-containing Dimetapp on Monday. New liquid Dimetapp formulas lacking PPA will head for store shelves next week, with pill versions to follow. Also, some stores are selling PPA-containing versions of its Robitussin-CF product, and some are selling a new non-PPA formula, in boxes flagged with a yellow band.

SmithKline Beecham Consumer Healthcare said people should not use its PPA-containing Contac 12-hour Cold Capsules, but five other Contac versions contain the safe pseudoephedrine.

Risk is small, effects can be deadly
Even though manufacturers learned three weeks ago that the FDA was preparing to act, when the agency's scientific advisers declared PPA unsafe, many scrambled Monday to decide what to do.

Top-selling manufacturers that refused to reveal their plans include Novartis Corp., maker of PPA-containing Triaminic and Tavist-D; Bayer Corp., maker of Alka-Seltzer Plus cold medicines; and Chattem Inc., maker of Dexatrim diet pills.

About 6 billion doses of PPA are sold in this country each year, mostly without prescriptions. There are a few PPA-containing prescription decongestants, and the FDA asked their makers also to stop selling them while it moves to ban prescription use as well.

While the risk of a hemorrhagic stroke, or bleeding in the brain, is very small to an individual user, these are often deadly strokes, and survivors can be left disabled.
With millions of Americans swallowing PPA daily, the FDA estimated it could be to blame for 200 to 500 strokes yearly just in people under age 50.

Hemorrhagic strokes typically occur in the elderly, and are extremely rare under age 50. In the 1980s, however, medical journals cited several dozen young women who suddenly had strokes days after taking their first PPA-containing diet pill.

A five-year Yale University study comparing PPA use among stroke survivors with healthy people concluded that PPA increases stroke risk for young women within three days of taking PPA-containing appetite suppressants, or within three days of taking their first-ever PPA dose for any reason. In some cases, using PPA increased stroke risk 12- to 15-fold.

Nobody knows why, although first-time PPA use sometimes temporarily raises blood pressure, an effect that wanes as the body gets used to the drug. Risk was highest with the higher doses -- more than 75 milligrams daily -- that dieters typically used.

The study didn't find men at risk, but the FDA cautioned that enough men weren't studied to be sure they're OK.
FDA Issues Warning

back to top

Cold or Diet Pills That Contain Phenylpropanolamine (PPA)

The FDA has warned all Americans that they should not take cold or diet pills that contain phenylpropanolamine (PPA). PPA has been linked to a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke among young women. The FDA also asked manufacturers to stop selling drugs that contain PPA and to replace it with a safer ingredient. Many drug stores began pulling products containing PPA from the shelves and have posted warnings about the potential dangers.

The FDA is considering adding warning labels to Celebrex indicating that it may be linked to an increased risk for heart attacks. This news comes after a study showed that patients taking a similar drug called Vioxx ran four times the risk for heart attack as those taking regular pain relievers such as ibuprofen. Because both drugs are COX-2 inhibitors, the FDA would apply labels to both medications.

May 25 — Ever since Celebrex and Vioxx hit the market in 1999, consumers have been bombarded with television ads depicting the benefits of the new arthritis drugs. Celebrex commercials showed joyful arthritis sufferers practicing tai chi, strolling the beach and zipping along scenic roads on tandem bicycles to the tune of “Celebrate.” Vioxx ads had similar themes, featuring arthritis patients pushing wheelbarrows, hammering nails and generally living it up.
At this point we don’t know the exact answer to that question. What this comes down to is a question of whether the increased heart risk is caused by a property that’s associated with this entire class of drugs [Cox-2 inhibitors, which includes both Vioxx and Celebrex] or we’re talking about a property that is unique to Vioxx. We don’t know the answer to that with certainty yet.

What is it about Vioxx that’s causing the heart problems. How does the drug work?
This study does not address the explanation for the increased rate of heart disease. One suggested explanation is that a drug like naproxen, like aspirin, actually protects people from heart disease, and that same level of protection is not afforded by a drug like Vioxx. It may be that a drug like Vioxx is different from naproxen or aspirin in terms of how it affects platelets. Whereas aspirin or naproxen protects from heart attacks because of their effect on platelets, a drug like Vioxx does not have those properties. It has also been suggested that Cox-2 inhibitors themselves might damage coronary vessels and that it is the drug itself that is leading to either increased clotting or damage to the vessel wall, but I think that’s quite controversial, and we lack sufficient evidence at this point to know exactly what the explanation is.

Merck is now recommending that patients on Vioxx take a low dose of aspirin along with the Vioxx. Will that offset the risk?
Certainly from a public-health standpoint, using low-dose aspirin is something that is recommended as a way to reduce the risk of heart disease. While I don’t think that it’s been proven, combining low-dose aspirin with treatment makes practical sense.

Are there differences in the pain relief offered by Vioxx and Celebrex versus other arthritis medications?
I don’t think that either Celebrex or Vioxx is more effective for pain relief than traditional nonsteroidal drugs. On the other hand, I think there’s rather substantial evidence that both drugs are much safer in terms of reducing the risk of side effects, particularly gastrointestinal side effects, like ulcer, gastrointestinal bleeding or obstructions.

If patients are now supposed to take aspirin, which has a higher risk of those gastrointestinal side effects like ulcers, will that offset the benefit of Celebrex and Vioxx?
We’re talking about a very low recommended dose. We’re talking a baby aspirin a day. There might be a very, very small increase in GI side effects, but the protective effects on the heart might outweigh that increase.

No studies have been released on the heart risks associated specifically with Celebrex. Is it safe to assume that the risks posed by Vioxx are similar to those posed by Celebrex, since they’re both in the same drug category?

back to top

Baycol

German drug manufacturer Bayer AG pulled their popular cholesterol lowering drug, Baycol from the market. Baycol was withdrawn from the market because it has been linked to 31 US deaths from a muscle-related side effect, according to the US Food and Drug Administration. Baycol is one of an extraordinarily popular family of cholesterol-lowering drugs called "statins." Baycol was approved in the United States by the FDA in 1997.

The FDA had received reports of Baycol patients experiencing severe rhabdomyolysis. Rhabdomyolysis is a condition that causes muscle-cell breakdown (atrophy) and causes muscle pain, weakness, tenderness, malaise, fever, dark urine, nausea and vomiting.

In a Reuters article the FDA claimed that in some cases, rhabdomyolysis is so severe that patients develop failure of the kidney or other organs, which can be fatal.
In a written statement the said, "the FDA has received reports of 31 US deaths due to severe rhabdomyolysis associated with use of Baycol.'' Twelve of the 31 deaths involved patients taking another drug, gemfibrozil, the FDA said.

"While all statins have been associated with very rare reports of rhabdomyolysis, cases of fatal rhabdomyolysis in association with the use of Baycol have been reported significantly more frequently than for other approved statins,'' the FDA said.

Baycol patients who are experiencing muscle pain or are also taking gemfibrozil should discontinue Baycol immediately and consult their physician, the FDA said. Others taking Baycol should talk to their doctors about switching to alternative medications, the agency advised.

back to top

Vioxx

The popular and heavily advertised arthritis drugs Vioxx and Celebrex have been linked by researchers to an increase in the risk of blood, clots, heart attacks and strokes. The study from the Cleveland Clinic appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association and was based on an analysis of previous clinical trials. Celebrex and Vioxx are projected to produce U.S. sales greater than $6 billion this year.

In a study of more than 8,000 patients that compared the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (Vioxx) with the traditional NSAID naproxen, the risk of cardiovascular problems, including heart attack, chest pain related to heart disease, stroke, sudden death and blood clots, was more than two times higher in the rofecoxib group than in the naproxen group.

Vioxx and Celebrex are classified as and known as COX-2 inhibitors, or coxibs. COX-2 inhibitors, like older drugs such as ibuprofen and naproxen, are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs. Older NSAIDs reduce inflammation by blocking an enzyme called COX-2, but they also block another enzyme called COX-1. This enzyme helps protect the lining of the stomach, so blocking COX-1 can cause stomach irritation. COX-2 inhibitors only block COX-2, leaving the stomach-protecting COX-1 alone.

The annual rates of heart attack in both the Celebrex (celecoxib) and Vioxx (rofecoxib) studies were increased compared to a review of studies containing a total of more than 48,000 patients. In those studies, 0.52% of patients taking an inactive placebo pill had a heart attack each year. The annual rate of heart attack was 0.74% for patients taking rofecoxib and 0.80% for those taking celecoxib.

The researches believe that until more research is done, doctors should use caution in prescribing Vioxx and Celebrex to patients with heart disease.

back to top

Rezulin

Rezulin Special Update
Recent Rezulin settlements have been reached between victims of Rezulin side effects(plaintiffs) and the manufacturer of Rezulin. If you or a loved one has been injured by Rezulin it is important to contact an Atlanta, Georgia personal injury and defective product attorney experienced in Rezulin litigation quickly as these cases are subject to statute of limitations. To have your case reviewed by an experienced Georgia Rezulin attorney please click the link above for a free case evaluation.

On March 21, 2000 head of the FDA's center for Drug evaluation and Research stated that the "Continued use of Rezulin" posed an "unacceptable risk " to diabetes patients. At least 63 Rezulin users have died of liver failure. The total number of Rezulin related deaths is estimated to be as many as ten times higher than the reported 63 cases. For this reason, Rezulin was removed from the United States market.

Doctors prescribed Rezulin to diabetics who took insulin but whose blood sugar was not well controlled. Rezulin was designed to help insulin (either your own or injected) work better, by drawing the sugar from your blood into the cells to supply energy.

Rezulin was approved for diabetics who:

  • Used insulin
  • Took certain types of oral antihyperglycemic medications or fodiabetics
  • Could no longer be controlled by diet and exercise alone.

Rezulin was banned in England in December 1997, following the death of an American who took the drug. The drug manufacturer, Warner-Lambert successfully fought a ban on Rezulin in the U.S. for 27 months before the FDA decided to prohibit sales of Rezulin on March 21, 2000. Since this date hundreds of Rezulin related lawsuits have been filed.

Before the ban, sales of Rezulin generated Warner-Lambert $1.8 billion in revenues. At its peak, the drug was prescribed 488,000 times in January of 1999. 63 Rezulin users have reportedly died from use of the drug. The deaths were caused by liver failure. The total number of deaths associated with Rezulin is likely to exceed 63 by many times according to experts.
Recent Rezulin settlements have been reached between victims (plaintiffs) and the manufacturer. If you or a loved one has been injured by Rezulin it is important to contact an Atlanta, Georgia Rezulin attorney quickly as these cases are subject to statute of limitations. To have your case reviewed by an experienced Georgia Rezulin attorney please click the link below for a free case evaluation.

back to top

FEN-PHEN

In September 1997, the FDA requested the recall of fenfluramine (Pondimin) and dexfenfluramine (Redux), two drugs taken with phentermine to produce a weight loss “drug cocktail.” Increasing evidence that fen-phen caused heart valve defects led the FDA to order the recall. Read the FDA press release below.

back to top

Thimerosal (Mercury Poisoning from Vaccines)

Thimerosal is the most common preservative that is used in vaccines and biologics that are marketed in the United States. Thimerosal is used to help prevent a vaccine from spoiling, for inactivating bacteria used to formulate several vaccines, and in preventing bacterial contamination of the final product. Several of the vaccines recommended routinely for children in the United States contain thimerosal. However, reports have surfaced linking thimerosal to mercury poisoning in infants often causing autism.

On July 7, 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued with the US Public Health Service (USPHS) a joint statement alerting clinicians and the public of concern about thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative used in some vaccines. The reason for the warning is that thimerosal contains a related mercury compound called ethyl mercury. Mercury is a toxic metal that can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions.

The Food and Drug Administration suggested that some infants, depending on which vaccines they receive and the timing of those vaccines, may be exposed to levels of ethyl mercury that could build up to exceed one of the federal guidelines established for the intake of methyl mercury. Symptoms of mercury toxicity in young children are extremely similar to those of autism.

This can explain the recent increase in the numbers of children diagnosed with autism since the early 1990's. The numerous amount of children diagnosed with autism seems to directly correlate with the recommendation of both the hepatitis B and HIB vaccine to infants in the early 1990s. Autism is a neurological disorder that is characterized by impairments in language, cognitive and social development.

Autism symptoms are usually encountered in the first two years of life. In the past autism was considered a rare disorder with an incidence of occurrence of approximately 1-3 per 10,000 births. More recently however, Autism is being diagnosed much more frequently with an incidence of occurrence of 20-40 per 10,000 births and reports of 1 per 150 births have been reported in several states including New Jersey and California.

SEE OUR FREE CASE EVALUATION FORM

back to top

 

 

Atlanta Georgia Defective Products and Personal Injury Attorneys

 

NEED A GEORGIA REZULIN ATTORNEY?

 

HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT REZULIN?
ASK A REZULIN LAWYER IN ATLANTA


The hiring of a Rezulin lawyer in Atlanta, Georgia is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertising. Before you decide on an Atlanta, Georgia Rezulin attorney ask for free written information about the firm, its qualifications and experience.

Sitemap
Copyright © 2008 Robbins & Associates, PC All Rights Reserved
Website Design By Carbon42